nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
延河着生藻类群落结构特征及影响因素分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3205702)
邮箱(Email): yanzhen0818@outlook.com;
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-07-24
出版时间: 2026-07-24
网络发布时间: 2026-07-24
移动端阅读
摘要:

为了解延河着生藻类群落分布及影响因素,于2023年8月(丰水期)、10月(平水期)及2024年3月(枯水期)对延河及其支流15个监测断面进行采样分析,系统探索该河流着生藻类构成,分析水环境因子与群落结构之间的关系。共检出着生藻类6门67属179种,硅藻门占52.5%,绿藻门占24.0%、蓝藻门占19.6%、裸藻门占2.8%、金藻门和隐藻门均占0.55%;各水期着生藻类物种数表现为丰水期>枯水期>平水期,优势种16属25种(枯水期占84%),主要为硅藻,蓝藻仅在枯水期检出,丰水期未检出优势种;丰、平、枯水期着生藻类平均密度分别为4.5×104、6.8×104、4.2×104个/cm2,平水期平均密度显著高于枯水期和丰水期;Margalef丰富度指数表明延河水质丰水期无污染,平、枯水期均为β-中污染;RDA表明丰、平、枯水期影响着生藻类的共同主要因子为水温、pH值、NH3-N,此外,水深、TP、流速和TN分别为丰、平、枯水期的主要影响因子。

Abstract:

In order to explore the spatial and temporal distribution of periphytic algal community and its relationship with water environmental factors in Yanhe River basin,a primary tributary of the middle reaches of the Yellow River,Samples were collected from 15 monitoring sections of the Yanhe River Basin from August(high water period),October(normal water period) 2023 and March(low water period) 2024.For the first time,the composition of periphytic algae and the relationship between water environment factors and community were studied.The results indicated that a total of 179 periphytic algae species were identified in Yanhe River Basin,belonging to 67 genera of 6 phyla.The species of Bacillariophyta accounted for 52.5%,the Chlorophyta for 24.0%,the Cyanophyta for 19.6%,the Euglenophyta for 2.8%,the Chrysophyta and Cryptophyta both for 0.55%.The species number of periphytic algae was in the order of high water period>low water period>normal water period.There are 25 dominant species of periphytic algae,belonging to 16 genera,mainly Bacillariophyta,in particular,the low water period constituted for 84%,while Cyanophyta were only detected during the low water period and there were no dominant species in the high water period.The average densities of periphytic algae in the high,normal,and low water periods were 4.5×104 ind/cm2,6.8×104 ind/cm2,and 4.2×104 ind/cm2,respectively,with the autumn density being significantly higher than that spring and summer.The Margalef richness index demonstrated that the water quality of the Yanhe River Basin was no polluted in the high water period,buy the pollution wasβ-medium in both the normal and low water periods.Redundancy analysis(RDA) revealed that the common main water environment factors affecting periphytic algae diversity distribution in Yanhe River Basin during the high,normal and low water periods were water temperature,pH value and ammonia.Additionally,water depth,total phosphorus,flow velocity and total nitrogen were the main influencing factors in the high water period,normal water period and low water period,respectively.Short-term monitoring is insufficient to accurately reflect the enhancement of water ecological quality and the alterations in the aquatic community structure within the basin.

参考文献

[1]张萌,陈小龙,狄乾斌.黄河流域环境治理效率的区域差异、动态演进及影响因素[J].环境工程技术学报,2024,14(6):1763-1776.

[2]丁一桐,潘保柱.黄河流域水生生物资源评估及问题诊断[J].中国环境监测,2022,38(1):1-13.

[3]左其亭.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展研究框架[J].人民黄河,2019,41(11):1-6,16.

[4]李亚妮,刘彩琴,黄鹏.延河流域浮游生物群落多样性的调查[J].延安大学学报(自然科学版),2014,33(1):61-64.

[5]谢海莎,邵瑞华,王际焱,等.延河丰水期浮游生物群落分布及其与环境因子的关系[J].环境保护科学,2022,48(1):108-114.

[6]王鹤,朱龙,轩晓博,等.延河流域水生生物资源调查与多样性分析[J].家畜生态学报,2022,43(1):36-42.

[7]卢悦,胡恩,丁一桐,等.西北地区延河流域浮游植物群落结构特征及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(6):1669-1679.

[8]贺瑶,孙长顺,侯易明,等.基于流域底栖动物完整性指数评价延河的水生态健康[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(3):806-816.

[9]杨子杰.延河流域浮游动物群落特征及构建机制研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2023:16-17.

[10]樊甜甜,杨柏贺.太子河流域春季着生藻群落与水环境因子的关系[J].水产学杂志,2019,32(2):44-48.

[11]殷旭旺,渠晓东,李庆南,等.基于着生藻类的太子河流域水生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(6):1677-1691.

[12]POTAPOVA M,CHARLES F D. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States[J]. Ecological Indicators,2005,7(1):48-70.

[13]胡鸿均,魏印心.中国淡水藻类-系统、分类及生态[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:23-1023.

[14]水利部水文局.中国内陆水域常见藻类图谱[M].武汉:长江出版社,2012:1-248.

[15]翁建中,徐恒省.中国常见浮游藻类图谱[M].上海:上海科技出版社,2010:8-223.

[16]朱蕙忠,陈嘉佑.中国西藏硅藻[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:87-353.

[17]韩茂森,束蕴芳.中国淡水生物图谱[M].北京:海洋出版社,1995:1-390.

[18]中国水利企业协会.着生藻类监测技术规范:T/CWEC37—2023[S].北京:中国水利企业协会,2023:5-6.

[19]苏文杭,闫龙,王海龙,等.雅砻江干流着生藻类群落特征及生态位分析[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2025,56(1):1-12.

[20]孟顺龙,瞿建宏,裘丽萍,等.富营养化水体降磷对浮游植物群落结构特征的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(9):1578-1582.

[21]肖妮娜,张萌,冯兵,等.丰水期赣江流域着生藻类群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(4):900-910.

[22]张耀文,李洪,李嘉,等.西南山区典型河道型水库藻类功能群时空演替特征及其影响因素:以紫坪铺水库为例[J].环境科学,2018,39(6):2680-2687.

[23]刘麟菲.渭河流域着生藻类群落结构与环境因子的关系[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2014:11-13.

[24]白辰.吉林省密江河着生藻类多样性及其与生态系统功能的关系研究[D].大连:大连海洋大学,2023:21-23.

[25]杨璐,李佳蹊,钱瑭毅,等.太子河着生藻类群落与氮、磷营养盐的定量关系研究[J].生态毒理学报,2019,14(6):104-117.

[26]BELLINGER J B,COCQUYT C,O’ REILLY M C. Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams[J]. Hydrobiologia,2006,573:75-87.

[27]BOWMAN F M,CHAMBERS A P,SCHINDLER W D. Epilithic algal abundance in relation to anthropogenic changes in phosphorus bioavailability and limitation in mountain rivers[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,2005,62(1):174-184.

[28]刘惠秋.雅鲁藏布江下游着生藻类群落多样性格局与水生态环境质量评价[D].拉萨:西藏大学,2024:28-29.

[29]吕绪聪.黄河流域着生硅藻多样性及格局分化的决定因素[D].新乡:河南师范大学,2023:93-95.

[30]何海生,刘金殿,张爱菊,等.钱塘江水域秋季着生藻类群落特征与水环境因子的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(13):292-297.

[31]BLINN D W. Diatom community structure along physicochemical gradients in saline lakes[J]. Ecology,1993,74(4):1246-1263.

[32]LELAND V H,PORTER D S. Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use[J]. Freshwater Biology,2000,44(2):279-301.

[33]臧小苗,张远,林佳宁,等.滑石矿开采对着生藻群落结构和水环境的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(9):3721-3730.

基本信息:

中图分类号:X143;X173;Q948.8

引用信息:

[1]师艳丽,闫祯,陈振宇,等.延河着生藻类群落结构特征及影响因素分析[J].人民黄河().

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3205702)

发布时间:

2026-07-24

出版时间:

2026-07-24

网络发布时间:

2026-07-24

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文